Noah tells the age old story of Noah's Ark. God makes man. Man turns evil. God entrusts Noah, the one good man, to build a boat and save all of the animals. Noah builds boat. God floods Earth. Humanity starts anew. We've all heard the story a million times before, and it's been made into numerous films. Why would anyone want to see it rehashed again? Believe me, if it weren't for the guy directing Noah, I would never have even considered seeing it. Darren Aronofsky is a pretty great director. I haven't seen everything he's done, but I've seen enough to know he's talented as hell and can make a damn good movie. Requiem for a Dream was the best anti-drug film I've seen since Trainspotting, and the most effective one I may have ever seen. Pi was weird, but also a work of sheer genius. Therefore, I trusted Aronofsky to make a decent film without just repeating what's already been said a million times before. Basically, I was looking to Mr. Aronofsky to do more than just tell the story. Which, despite some issues, is exactly what he has done. The film starts out in the beginning. The VERY beginning. Before everything. It goes on to tell the basic history leading up to Noah himself. God creating the world, Adam and Eve eating the apple, and Cain killing Abel. Cain spawned a whole civilization load of ancestors, all of them horrible criminals and barbarians. Only Seth, Cain's other brother, was able to have some decent offspring. The last of the line of Seth, is Noah and his family. They are an honest and devout people in a strange world of scavengers, cannibals, and warriors. Noah's family lives a life of wandering, just getting enough food to survive. All while fighting off bandits and various undesirable people. That is, until Noah has a dream. In the dream, God tells him to build an ark. So, he does. Noah builds the ark with the help of some giant fallen angels, called The Watchers, and after some intense battles with some of the sons of Cain, the Earth floods and he sets sail. Obviously, at this point Aronofsky needs to create some real story. Noah just chilling on a boat for two hours wouldn't really cut it. So, he adds in some drama like having Noah's adopted daughter get pregnant. And there's a stowaway on the ship. All that does feel a tad contrived, but it's not for naught. While uneven feeling at times, these events move the story along at a quick pace and allow for the movie to go places where it really does need to go. The plot can get messy, but Aronofsky is skilled enough to clean up what he can towards the end. Plus, his near flawless direction helps a lot. There's also a sub plot involving Noah's son Ham that I found to be fairly interesting and well done. Noah relies heavily on CGI for its visuals, but Aronofsky uses the CGI very well. CGI in the wrong hands can result in something like Transformers 3 or the Star Wars prequels. Darren Aronofsky om the other hand, uses his CGI to make beautifully striking images of the vast and expansive ocean that covers the Earth and the universe that lies beyond. He handles this movie more like it's a fantasy epic, and less like a Bible story. Which in turn makes it more interesting and much more admirable. Anyone can adapt a Bible story, it's been done since movies were invented. But I've yet to see someone be so creative and brave when making a biblical film. It feels incredibly clunky at parts and it's messy at times, but in the end it's kind of astounding. I walked out of the theater feeling hopeful. Not necessarily for humanity, but for the movie industry. Noah is a project Aronofsky is obviously passionate about. Because of his deep commitment to the project, and the amount of money he was given, Noah has become something more than a Biblical epic or church movie. Something else entirely. Aronofsky has humanized the character of Noah. He's made him angry, and scared, and a little bit insane. He's not the Bible thumping do-gooder portrayed in those Sunday school cartoons. He's a damaged man holding on to the weak threads reality, like many of the characters in Aronofsky's films. That's what makes this movie so powerful and so awesome. Russell Crowe gives a stellar performance in the title role, which certainly helps. Noah building his ark is a portrayed as a massive undertaking that takes a lot of faith, passion, and time. The film is a lot like that, with Darren Aronofsky as Noah. Unsure of his success, he goes forth with the massive project of making something grand. I think it's safe to say he has succeeded. Whether you're a devout believer or not doesn't matter, Noah is much more than a Bible movie and can be experienced as so. It's far from perfect, but it's the best job that probably can be done. I applaud Aronofsky for his skill and effort. Noah isn't his best film, but it's his most ambitious and it's certainly his biggest. I can congratulate him on ambition alone, the fact that he has succeeded in some sense is really astounding. So yes, the movie is good. I give Noah 3.9 out of 5 stars. Happy Viewing. If you haven't done so already, you can follow me on Twitter @WhitsMovies and like me on Facebook at Facebook.com/WhitsMovies.
Showing posts with label epic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label epic. Show all posts
Saturday, March 29, 2014
Monday, February 3, 2014
Once Upon a Time in the West review
I really hate the word epic. It's overused in all the wrong ways and it's never used when it should be. In the case of this movie, I believe the word epic can be used.
As you very well may know, I'm partial to westerns. Sergio Leone westerns in particular. And since I'm trying to watch a lot of westerns to learn about and understand the genre more, it was only natural of me to watch Sergio Leone's famous 1968 western, Once Upon a Time in the West. I had tried to watch the whole thing about a year ago, but I kept getting distracted and not being able to finish it. Finally, I sat down and watched the entire film from start to finish. While I can't say it's Leone's best movie, it certainly is a very good one. Once Upon a Time in the West is a story of Jill McBain (Claudia Cardinale), whose family was killed by a group of land hungry bandits led by the very evil Frank (Henry Fonda). Cardinale teams up with the notorious Cheyenne (Jason Robards) to help her stay safe. Meanwhile, a stranger known only as Harmonica (Charles Bronson) also helps Cheyenne, while simultaneously attending to his own agenda. I feel like Sergio Leone movies just get better as they go along. Starting with the very good A Fistful of Dollars, and getting increasingly better from there. The only exception of the rule is that The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly came before Once Upon a Time in the West. In all fairness, it is quite difficult to beat The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly. The rest of his movies follow that path though. Maybe because he just got more and more experienced. Once Upon a Time in the West is one of his later films, and one of his best. It combines serious drama with classic western standoffs and good acting. While I really do love all of Sergio Leone's westerns, the acting in them is never great. Granted, I've unfortunately never seen Once Upon a Time in America. Sure, Clint Eastwood's outlaw is a classic character, but is the performance really good? He is passable, but most of the other roles can be laughably bad. What makes Once Upon a Time in the West stand out is its talented all star cast. Charles Bronson is alright in the role of Harmonica. He plays him with a nice mix of deadpan and comedy, while still maintaining the mystery of the character. Jason Robards is good too as Cheyenne. He's nothing truly special though. Henry Fonda is deliciously bad as the main criminal, Frank. I don't think I've seen Fonda play a bad guy before, but he is good at it. The real star here is Claudia Cardinale. She is talented, pretty, and able to carry this movie on her shoulders. I haven't seen her in anything else but I'd certainly like to. Despite the film being made in a time when woman weren't as respected, Cardinale plays a strong and independent woman who isn't a nagging housewife or Playboy girl. She isn't exploited here, and she isn't left in the background either. Cardinale is front and center, showing off her skill. And that is just were she deserves to be. As I mentioned above, this film is really epic. It spans a whole three hours, and makes use of every minute. The last forty minutes are riveting. There is an incredible gunfight, and a terrific bittersweet ending that shows us that no matter what, the growth of the West will prevail. Ennio Morricone's terrific score helps too. The composer always teams up with Leone for his films, and the finished product is always great. I recommend you to listen to all of his western musical scores. They're all great in their own way. Overall, this movie is about the hardiness and promise of the Old West. It rings with the message of prevailing through the darkness and triumphing evil. It's a good old fashioned adventure epic. It's not Sergio Leone's most meaningful western, (Duck, You Sucker takes the cake for that) but it's a hell of a lot more thoughtful than some of his other stuff. I do recommend the movie. It's nowhere near perfect, but it still is awe inspiring and good. Happy Viewing everyone. Don't forget to follow me on Twitter @WhitsMovies and like me on Facebook at Facebook.com/WhitsMovies!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)